Staff Augmentation Strategy: Pros and Cons

The word augmentation means “add value” or “enhance the worth” of something. In this current era of digitization remote staff hiring is preferred to control additional overheads above short-term or long-term projects. In contrast to project outsourcing, the staff augmentation results in an additional 78% success and 62% better profits. In this article, we will discuss the pros and cons of staff augmentation.

Pros of Staff Augmentation

According to staffing agencies, the rise in staff augmentation has inclined by 200% since 2021 because of its limitless gains in the future for businesses. Let’s elaborate on some pros of staff

augmentation where onboarding the best talent is of worth.

• Best Talent Acquisition: Hire top tier technical experts with exceptional skills in your desired domain. For instance, you have a deep learning project for deep face recognition and you’re looking for a skilled deep learning engineer who is currently working on real projects. Then, remote staff hiring will be great in that case. Because on-site hiring may cost you even $10,000 in recruitment.

• On-Time Project Delivery: Meeting deadlines is honestly hard but a professional personality always respects deadlines as well as project deliverables. Remote staffing also relieves organizations with a resource that guarantees product delivery within deadlines.

• Keep Executives In Loop: Staff augmentation has a massive advantage as it allows executives to keep updated in the loop from the designing phase to testing. Because it was the drawback of project outsourcing where it failed & was replaced with talent acquisition.

• Early Project Delivery: Always promise early project delivery where clients are satisfied with deliverables and return 100% success rate.

• Prioritize Modern Technologies: Prioritize Modern Technologies: As research reveals that 77% of IT-augmented staff work on cutting-edge technologies to create robust but scalable end-products when delivered.

• Fewer Project Costs: In contrast with in-house teams, talent solutions services cost less. You might be thinking, How? Staff augmentation minimizes operation costs, technical support, supplies,  tech equipment, and office space costs. This results in fewer project costs.

Cons of Staff Augmentation

• Oversight & Management: As executives directly involved in project delivery so due to their involvement offshoot micromanagement and offends project managers and development teams of daily work plans and reports.

• Higher Long-term Labor Costs: Staff augmentation results in higher costs in long-term projects because it is seen as successful in short-term projects.

• Onboarding External Talent: Integration of external teams results in comparison within teams and hence job switch rate changes invariably.

Staff Augmentation vs Project Outsourcing: Which one is best?

In staff augmentation executives directly control projects and stay in the loop to note where the project stands and progress in completion. On the other hand, project outsourcing results in full control of contractors so which may result in delayed project delivery with a compromised resultant product.

Conclusion

After knowing the whole online resource staffing process, it is mandatory to consider both pros and cons before you are apt for any onboarding strategy. But companies around the sphere prefer staff augmentation or talent solutions offered by experts. These talent solutions services aim to deliver the best project in less time & the availability of technical resources.